Corporate A Responsibility Global Business - Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Corporate A Responsibility Global Business? Answer: Introduction: The continuous reporting framework or the need of ASX has adequate significance for the Australian organisations. In accordance with this need, the Australian firms need to perform some particular obligations associated with the disclosure of share-related information under the Listing Rules 3.1 and 3.1A. As per the continuous disclosure need of ASX, the business firms are needed to provide any particular information to the ASX having material influence on the share prices of the organisations (Kabir, Rahman and Su 2017). ASX states that the disclosure obligation is crucial for the Australian firms in increasing the efficacy and transparency in the share market. However, it is to be mentioned that certain questions are associated with the importance and effectiveness of the continuous disclosure regime of ASX in relation to the Australian firms. For establishing such necessity of the framework for the Australian firms, it is of utmost importance to explain about the significance of the continuous disclosure regime. Particularly, discussion has been made about the possible advantages that the Australian entities could obtain by adhering to the doctrines and standards of the continuous disclosure regime. Hence, the current report aims to discuss whether this regime is useful for the ASX listed organisations or not. Literature review: With the help of the continuous disclosure regime, it could be cited that the Australian firms could seek certain benefits by adhering to its obligations and they are demonstrated briefly as follows: Properly informed market: The continuous disclosure regime enables the business organisations to disclose adequate information to the investors, which would help them in making rightful judgement regarding the prices of the shares (Birt, Muthusamy and Bir 2017). In this regard, it is to be borne in mind that the firms are not expected to publish falsified or misleading information to the investors for attracting investments in their organisations. Along with this, with the help of the continuous disclosure regime, the organisations are able to answer to the market speculations and rumours having material effect on the share prices of the organisations (Malak, Chern and Shabani 2017). Timely disclosure of information: The next significant influence of the continuous disclosure regime on the Australian firms is the timely disclosure of information. Such obligation related to continuous disclosure denotes that the organisations are accountable to reveal information, which are sensitive and it has material impact on the share prices, as soon as they know the same. However, the organisations could avoid this rule, in which the disclosure could be withheld. In accordance with the same principle, the Australian firms are obliged in revealing timely information, when it is not withheld legitimately. Along with this, the firms are needed to provide justifications to any type of market rumour or obligation associated with the share prices (North 2014). Identical access to information: The regime of continuous disclosure enables all the investors to benefit equally from identical access to the share-related information of the Australian entities. In conformance to this disclosure framework, the Australian entities are obliged to ensure the availability of price sensitive information equally to all the investors. The intention is to assure that some investors are not placed in a beneficial or disadvantageous position in contrast to the other investors (Burca, Mates and Puscas 2015). Such aspect assures the transparency of the share market. When the selective disclosure is not present, the chances of insider trading to the materially price sensitive information of shares are minimised. Thus, it is to be mentioned that this specific aspect enables in winning the confidence of the shareholders and the investors in ASX. Premature disclosure: Another main intention of implementing continuous disclosure framework is the restriction of the premature disclosure of information associated with shares (Henderson et al. 2015). It is to be borne in mind that the adoption of the continuous disclosure regime enables in maintaining a balance between the timely release of material information regarding shares and the premature release of share information to be contributed to the creation of falsified share market. When the continuous disclosure framework is not present, the organisations attempt to make false prices for their securities and shares. Due to this reason, the business firms need not be associated to form environment that might result in conflicting and falsified information regarding securities and shares (Duffy 2014). Different commercial interests: The adoption of the continuous disclosure framework enables in protecting the commercial interests of various parties engaged in share market transactions. The continuous disclosure regime enables the business organisations to strike a balance between the timely release of materially sensitive information of shares along with protecting the commercial interests of the investors and shareholders (Overland 2014). Due to this reason, the Australian organisations are needed to maintain the privacy of share-related information. In order to protect the commercial interests of the shareholders and investors, it has become possible to win their trust in the share market. Due to this specific reason, the Australian entities need to adhere to the continuous disclosure regime (Kent and Zunker 2015). Privacy of information withheld from disclosure: The continuous disclosure regime states that the Australian organisations are needed to maintain the privacy of sensitive share information withheld from the investors and shareholders. The business firms have the right of spreading sensitive information to the commercial partners and advisers; however, these partners and commercial partners do not have the right of trading in the securities and shares of the organisation depending on such information. This is because such information is not available to the investors. Such specific aspect denotes that it is on the firms in maintaining the privacy of the disclosed information to the investors and shareholders (Jackson et al. 2015). Remedies and enforcement: The continuous disclosure regime enables the Australian firms to establish provisions of enforcement and remedies associated with the sensitive material information for the shares. The adoption of continuous disclosure regime helps the organisations in the formation of consistent and clear guidance for the release of material share and price sensitive information (Chang, Jackson and Wee 2017). Particularly, continuous disclosure regime sets few penalties for various types of circumstances associated with the release of share information on the part of the Australian organisations. Moreover, the organisations could obtain appropriate mechanism in order to provide remedy to the inadequate disclosure of material share and sensitive information. Such aspect has its significance for the Australian forms to release sensitive and material share information. Based on the above discussion, it could be observed that the continuous disclosure regime has innumerable benefits for the Australian entities. The initiation of continuous disclosure regime enables the business firms to release considerable amount of information for the shareholders and investors. The reason is to undertake appropriate investment decisions (Riaz, Ray and Ray 2015). Besides this, the Australian firms need to perform the duty of disclosing material and price sensitive information at the time of obtaining them. Hence, all such aspects perform a crucial role for the listed entities in releasing the pertinent and rightful information in the equity market. Moreover, it could be seen that the presence of continuous disclosure regime makes the identical distribution of sensitive material information to the shareholders and investors. Hence, it could be cited that this framework performs a crucial part in the minimisation of information asymmetry between the investors and li sted entities. Timely and effective disclosure is an efficient tool to implement governance in the companies associated with the share trading. All such aspects signify that continuous disclosure regime performs a crucial role for the Australian firms to release share information having material effect on the share prices of the organisations. Conclusion: Based on the above evaluation, it could be cited that the continuous reporting framework or the need of ASX has adequate significance for the Australian organisations. In accordance with this need, the Australian firms need to perform some particular obligations associated with the disclosure of share-related information under the Listing Rules 3.1 and 3.1A. As per the continuous disclosure need of ASX, the business firms are needed to provide any particular information to the ASX having material influence on the share prices of the organisations. Particularly, continuous disclosure regime sets few penalties for various types of circumstances associated with the release of share information on the part of the Australian organisations. Moreover, the organisations could obtain appropriate mechanism in order to provide remedy to the inadequate disclosure of material share and sensitive information. Such aspect has its significance for the Australian forms to release sensitive and material share information. Hence, it could be cited that this framework performs a crucial part in the minimisation of information asymmetry between the investors and listed entities. Timely and effective disclosure is an efficient tool to implement governance in the companies associated with the share trading. References: Annualreports.com., 2018.Annual Report 2015-16. [online] Available at: https://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReports/PDF/ASX_BAL_2016.pdf [Accessed 16 Jan. 2018]. Birt, J.L., Muthusamy, K. and Bir, P., 2017. XBRL and the Qualitative Characteristics of Useful Financial Information.Accounting Research Journal,30(1). Burca, V., Mates, D. and Puscas, A., 2015. Standard-Setters Versus Big4 Opinion, Concerning Iasb Revision Project of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. the Case of Presentation and Disclosures Chapter.Studia Universitatis Vasile Goldis AradEconomics Series,25(2), pp.81-107. Chang, M., Jackson, A.B. and Wee, M., 2017. A review of research on regulation changes in the Asia?Pacific region.Accounting Finance. Duffy, M., 2014. Towards better disclosure of corporate risk: A look at risk disclosure in periodic reporting.Adel. L. Rev.,35, p.385. Fergie, D., 2017. Strategies for selecting small caps.Equity,31(9), p.4. Henderson, S., Peirson, G., Herbohn, K. and Howieson, B., 2015.Issues in financial accounting. Pearson Higher Education AU. Hyatt, V.P. and Approx, A., 2017. ALL going well with acquisition and new games, new CEO looking to continue momentum. Jackson, A.B., Gallery, G. and Balatbat, M.C., 2015. The impact of litigation risk on the strategic timing of management earnings forecasts.Accounting Finance,55(2), pp.467-495. Kabir, H., Rahman, A.R. and Su, L., 2017. The Association between Goodwill Impairment Loss and Goodwill Impairment Test-Related Disclosures in Australia. Kent, P. and Zunker, T., 2015. A stakeholder analysis of employee disclosures in annual reports.Accounting Finance. Lewis, G., 2016. Bellamys Organic: Providing babies and young children with a pure start to life. Part 1 Case Study. Malak, S.S.D.A., Chern, O.S. and Shabani, N.A., 2017. Disclosure of Executive Directors Remuneration from Multiple Theoretical Lenses and Cultural Perspective.Advanced Science Letters,23(4), pp.3151-3154. North, G., 2014. Listed Company Disclosure and Financial Market Transparency: Is this a Battle Worth Fighting or Merely Policy and Regulatory Mantra?.Browser Download This Paper. Overland, J., 2014. Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting and Directors Duties: The Australian Experience. InCorporate Social Responsibility in the Global Business World(pp. 135-152). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Riaz, Z., Ray, S. and Ray, P.K., 2015. Collibration as an alternative regulatory mechanism to govern the disclosure of director and executive remuneration in Australia.International Journal of Corporate Governance,6(2-4), pp.241-274.